[an error occurred while processing this directive]
思想政治课研究
 首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们 | English
���������о�  2015, Vol. 35 Issue (3): 124-130    DOI:
������������ѧ�о� ����Ŀ¼ | ����Ŀ¼ | ������� | �߼�����  |   
����������ѧ���۵�ϵͳ������
���
���ʦ����ѧ��ѧԺ
On the System Theory Tendencies of Contemporary World Literary Theory
HAO Lan
the College of Literary Studies, Tianjin Normal University (Tianjin 300387, China)
 ȫ��: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   ���: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      ��������
ժҪ ��������������“������ѧ����”��̽���ձ����ϵͳ�۵������ر�������������˹̹��������ϵ���۵�Ӱ�졣�����о����ƴ�����һ����ͼͬʱ��Խ�ִ�����ִ���ʽ��Ŭ����������ѧ��ϵ������һ�ֿ��Խ���������˼ά�ļ����ϣ�Ԥʾ���ԱȽ���ѧΪ�������ѧ�о��ھ����˺��ִ��Ķ��Ѻ�����֮���ع����ϵͳ�������ģ�����һ�����Ψһ���ĵľܾ�Ҳ�����������ִ������ͳһ�ԣ�������Щ���ۼҵ��о������Ȼ����������������ıײ�����������δ��ȴΪ����������ѧ��ϵ�IJ�ƽ���ṩ�˿��ܡ���֮����һ��������˱����ִ��Ļ���������õ���ʷ�еľ��ѣ������˱Ƚ���ѧ��������ѧ�����������Ѫ����
����
�ѱ����Ƽ�������
�����ҵ����
�������ù�����
E-mail Alert
RSS
�����������
���
�ؼ����� ������ѧ���ۣ� ϵͳ�ۣ� ��˹����·   ����ŵ�ߣ� ���ʸ�·   Ī���٣� ����·   ��ķ��ʲ     
Abstract�� Since the turn of the century, explorations into world literary theories have taken on the nature of general systems theory, which has been particularly benefited from the impact Immanuel Wallerstein’s world system theory. This trend in the study of literary theories represents an attempt to simultaneously transcend the modern and post-modern paradigm. For this trend, world literature system is constructed with the assumption that literature can be holistically approached, which may foreshow an ambition of a systematic macro-reconstruction after post-modern fragmentation, but this trend may be distinguished from the unity of modernism as it rejects unicentrism. The paper argues that the research along this trend, although largely Western-centred, could provide a starting point to break the inequality of world literature system in the future and that the trend could be understood as a call for the historical awareness which has been suspended by the skepticism of postmodernism and a continuation of the humanism in comparative literary studies and world literature.
Key words�� world literary theory   system theory   Pascale Casanova   Franco Moretti   David Damrosch   
���߼��: ��ᰣ����ʦ����ѧ��ѧԺ���ڣ���ѧ��ʿ����Ժ����Ӣ�����ȴ�ѧ��һѧԺ�����������ѧ�Ƚ���ѧϵ����ѧ�ߡ�������Ҫ�о���Ȥ�ڱȽ���ѧ��������ѧ���ۡ������й���ѧ�����о����������䣺haolan73@hotmail.com
���ñ���:   
���. ����������ѧ���۵�ϵͳ������[J]. ���������о�, 2015, 35(3): 124-130.
HAO Lan. On the System Theory Tendencies of Contemporary World Literary Theory[J]. TSLA, 2015, 35(3): 124-130.
��
[1] ������·�����أ�“��ѧ��������ϵ”����������ѧ���۶�����������·��ķ��ʲ�������Ρ��������ࡣ������������ѧ�����磬2013�꣬143-158��
[2] [Apter,Emily.“LiteraryWorldSystems,”TheoriesofWorldLiterature:AReader.Eds.DavidDamrosch,LiuHongtaoandYinXing.Beijing:PekingUniversityPress,2013.143-158.]
[3] ��˹����·����ŵ�ߣ�“��Ϊһ���������ѧ”����������ѧ���۶�����������·��ķ��ʲ�������Ρ��������ࡣ������������ѧ�����磬2013�ꡣ106-122��
[4] [Casanova,Pascale,“LiteratureasaWorld,”TheoriesofWorldLiterature:AReader.Eds.DavidDamrosch,LiuHongtao,YinXing.Beijing:PekingUniversityPress,2013.106-122]
[5] Damrosch,David.WhatisWorldLiterature?N.J.:PrincetonUniversityPress,2003.
[6] ---.HowtoReadWorldLiterature?MA:Wiley-Blackwell,2009.
[7] ---.“WorldliteratureinaPostcanonical,HypercanonicalAge.”ComparativeLiteratureinanAgeofGlobalization,Ed.HaunSaussy.Baltimore:TheJohnsHopkinsUniversityPress,2006.43-53.
[8] Forsdick,Charles,“WorldLiterature,Littérature-Monde:WhichLiterature?WhoseWorld?”Paragraph33.1(2010):125-143.
[9] Gregory,Derek.“ArealDifferentiationandPost-ModernHumanGeography.”HorizonsinHumanGeography(1989):67-96.
[10] ���ʸ�·Ī���٣�“������ѧ����/������ѧ���루���ࣩ”����������ѧ���۶�����������·��ķ��ʲ�������Ρ��������ࡣ������������ѧ�����磬2013�꣬123-142��
[11] [Moretti,Franco,“ConjecturesonWorldLiterature;MoreConjectures”,TheoriesofWorldLiterature:AReader.Ed.DavidDamrosch,LiuHongtaoandYinXing.Beijing:PekingUniversityPress,2013.123-142.]
[12] ----.Evolution,“World-Systems,Weltliteratur.”StudyingTransculturalLiteraryHistory(2006):113-121.
[13] ���׶�·�·��ᣬ“����������������ѧ����”����������ѧ���۶�����������·��ķ��ʲ�������Ρ��������ࡣ������������ѧ�����磬2013�꣬171-202��
[14] [Mufti,Aamir,“OrientalismandtheInstitutionofWorldLiterature”,TheoriesofWorldLiterature:AReader.Eds.DavidDamrosch,LiuHongtaoandYinXing.Beijing:PekingUniversityPress,2013.171-202.]
[15] Piazza,Alberto,“Afterword.”Graphs,Maps,Tree:AbstractModelsforaliteraryHistory.byFrancoMoretti,LondonVersa,2005.104-105.
[16] ����·��˹ŵ�������ִ�����������ѧ�����Ź����롣�Ϻ����Ϻ����ij����磬1998�ꡣ
[17] [Rosenau,Pauline,Post-modernismandtheSocialSciences.Shanghai:ShanghaiTranslationPublishingHouse,1998.]
[18] Wallerstein,Immanuel,World-SystemAnalysis:AnIntroduction,Durham:DukeUniversityPress.2004.
û���ҵ������������
 

版权所有 © 2011《思想政治课研究》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn