[an error occurred while processing this directive]
思想政治课研究
 首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们 | English
���������о�  2012, Vol. 32 Issue (4): 138-144    DOI:
ѧ������ ����Ŀ¼ | ����Ŀ¼ | ������� | �߼�����  |   
��������ʷ——�ۻ����صġ�ʶ�ֵ���;��
������
�廪��ѧ����ϵ
Experience and History:Hoggart’s The Uses of Literacy
Cheng Xiangyu
Department of Chinese, Tsinghua University
 ȫ��: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   ���: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      ��������
ժҪ  ����·�����صġ�ʶ�ֵ���;������Ӣ���Ļ��о��ĵ��֮��,Ҳ������ʮ���Ӣ���������Ļ�����������֮�����ں�����������,���ڻ����ر��˺��ⲿ��Ʒ�Ƿ�����"�Ļ���ά˹����",�Լ�����ս��Ӣ����������һϵ�������е�λ��,һֱ�DZ��ܹ�ע�Ľ���,���Ȿ��������Ե��������ʷ�龳��������ȴû�б��㷺����,����������������������Ǵ˼��˵�ѭ����������ͼ�ۺ����е���Ҫ�о�����,�ԡ�ʶ�ֵ���;��������ʷ�Ե����,��ʾ���е���ʷ�����Ժ����������Զ���������Ʒ����ԶӰ��,�Ӷ��Ը�Ϊ���ŵĽǶ����������صľ������뿪���ԡ� 
����
�ѱ����Ƽ�������
�����ҵ����
�������ù�����
E-mail Alert
RSS
�����������
������
�ؼ����� ������   ʶ�ֵ���;   ���˽׼��Ļ�   ���������Ļ�     
Abstract�� Richard Hoggart’s The Uses of Literacy is ge nerally taken to be an initiation of English cultural studies, and it also became one of the starting points of the "cultural controversy" emerged from the " first" New Left. The focal issues include whether Hoggart and this work fall under Leavisism, and what historical situation his work was born, but the historic al specificities and implications have not been given due examination so that the research literature on Hoggart has fallen into an either-or cycle. The papert akes into consideration the historial background of Hoggart’s The Uses of Literary and reveals the historical specificities and their influences on the work and its author so that it may illuminate the understanding of Hoggart’s limitations and innovation.
Key words�� Hoggart   The Uses of Literacy   culture of the working class   mass consumptive culture   
���߼��: �����ڣ��廪��ѧ����ϵ��ʿ������Ҫ�����������������о���
���ñ���:   
������. ��������ʷ——�ۻ����صġ�ʶ�ֵ���;��[J]. ���������о�, 2012, 32(4): 138-144.
CHENG Xiang-Yu. Experience and History:Hoggart’s The Uses of Literacy[J]. TSLA, 2012, 32(4): 138-144.
��
[1] �������ǣ���������ᡷ�����ɸ���ȫ־���롣�Ͼ����Ͼ���ѧ�����磬2006�ꡣ
[2] Baudrillard, Jean. The Consumer Society. Trans. Liu Chengfu and Quan Zhigang. Nanjing: Nanjing University P ress, 2006.]
[3] ����˹•���ֽ𣺡��Ļ����˼������ս��Ӣ��������ﵤ�롣��������������磬2008�ꡣ
[4] Dworkin, Dennis. Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain. Trans. Li Fengdan. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2008].
[5] Goodwin, Andrew. Introduction. The Uses of Literacy. By Richard Hoggart. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publisher, 1998.
[6] ˹ͼ����•������“����•�����ء���ʶ�ֵ���;�����Ļ�ת��”����Ӣ��������˼��ҡ��������ࡣ�Ͼ���������������磬2010�ꡣ
[7] Hall, Stuart. “Richard Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy and the Cultural Turn.” British New Left Thinkers. Ed. Zhang Liang. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House, 2010.]
[8] Hoggart, Richard. The Uses of Literacy. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publisher, 1998.
[9] Hoggart, Richard. Introduction to the Transaction Edition. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. By I. A. Richards. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2004.
[10] ������˹•����ն���“һ�ָ����Ļ���——50����Ļ�����������˹”�������˼������ѧ�о�����3�������֣�����ʦ����ѧ�����磬2000�ꡣ
[11] Mulhern, Francis. “A Welfare Culture?: Hoggart and Williams in 50s”, Research on Marxist Aesthetics, Vol. 3. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press, 2000.]
[12] E. P. ����ɭ����Ӣ�����˽׼����γɡ���Ǯ�˵����롣�Ͼ������ֳ����磬2001�ꡣ
[13] Thompson, E. P.. The Making of the English Working Class. Trans. Qian Chengdan, et al. Nanjing: Yilin Publishing House, 2001.]
[14] ���ɵ�•����˹������������ѧ�������¡��������롣���⣺���ϴ�ѧ�����磬2010�ꡣ
[15] Williams, Raymond. Politics and Letters. Trans. Fan Ke and Wang Weifen. Kaifeng: Henan University Press, 2010.]
û���ҵ������������
 

版权所有 © 2011《思想政治课研究》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn