[an error occurred while processing this directive]
思想政治课研究
 首页  |  期刊介绍  |  编 委 会  |  期刊订阅  |  投稿指南  |  广告服务  |  联系我们 | English
���������о�  2012, Vol. 32 Issue (5): 132-138    DOI:
�ֵ��������о� ����Ŀ¼ | ����Ŀ¼ | ������� | �߼�����  |   
Ů�����ʵ�����—ԭ��������——���ִ���ѧ����Ů������Ϊ��������
ë��Ө
������ѧ���ʽ���ѧԺ
The Folklore-Archetypal Criticism of Feminity: with the Female Image of Southern Yangtze in Chinese Modern Literature as a Critical Example
Mao Haiying
International College, Ningbo University
 ȫ��: PDF (519 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   ���: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      ��������
ժҪ ����ѧ����ѧ���ӽ��о��й��ֵ�����ѧ���ǶԴ�ͳ�о�������һ��ͻ���봴�¡�Ů�����ʵ�����—ԭ����������������ѧ����ѧ��������µ�����һ�ֱ�������Ů����ѧ���ۡ���һ���۵�ԨԴ��Ů������ԭ�����������ô˶��ִ���ѧ�������ұ��µ�Ů����ѧ������з��������Դ�����һ������������ԭ�͡���������ԭ�͡���������ԭ�ʹ���������“ԭ��”��չ�켣�������ִ���ѧ�Ķ�άڹ�ͣ�Ů�����ʵ�����—ԭ������͹�Գ�������ʵ�ʣ���ע���ձ����������Լ��ڲ�������̬����Ŀ��أ�ע�ظ������������Լ��������ڴ������ʵ����ԣ�ע������ԭ������ѧԭ�͵��ںϲ������������á�Ů�����ʵ�����—ԭ�������������й���ѧ������ʵ������һ����������Ů�Ը����������켰Ů������˼�뿪�򶼾������ȷ�����塣
����
�ѱ����Ƽ�������
�����ҵ����
�������ù�����
E-mail Alert
RSS
�����������
ë��Ө
�ؼ����� ����—ԭ������   Ů������   ����Ů������   �ִ���ѧ     
Abstract�� The folklore-prototypal criticism of feminity is a native theory on Chinese female literature criticism, originated from feminist prototypal criticism. The paper attempts to analyze the female iamge in Southern Yangtze literature and tries to delineate a trajectory of prototype development from the theme, the figure to the imago in folklore. Under the multiple approaches to modern literature, folklore-prototypal criticism of feminity has also taken on more theoretical significance in three aspects: the emphasis on exploration of universality and totality along with the ecological significance of the inner world development, the emphasis on individuality and particularity along with the prominance of the author’s inner creative temperament, and the emphasis on the fusion of psychological prototype and literary prototype along with the creation of aesthetic enjoyment. As an original native theoretical approach to Chinese literature, folklore-prototypal criticism of feminity may prove to be of unique significance in building female image and developing female inner world.
Key words�� folklore-prototypal criticism   feminity   female image of Southern Yangtze   modern literature   
��������:

����Ϊ2011����㽭ʡ��ѧ����ѧ�滮����“����Ů�����׵���ѧչ���о�—���ִ���ѧ��������Ϊ��”[��Ŀ��ţ�11JCZW02YB] �Ľ׶����о��ɹ���

���߼��: ë��Ө����ѧ��ʿ��������ѧ���ʽ���ѧԺ�����ڣ���Ҫ����Ů����ѧ����������ѧ�о����������䣺maohy0612@hotmail.com��
���ñ���:   
ë��Ө. Ů�����ʵ�����—ԭ��������——���ִ���ѧ����Ů������Ϊ��������[J]. ���������о�, 2012, 32(5): 132-138.
MAO Hai-Ying. The Folklore-Archetypal Criticism of Feminity: with the Female Image of Southern Yangtze in Chinese Modern Literature as a Critical Example[J]. TSLA, 2012, 32(5): 132-138.
��
[1] �̽�ǣ���ԭ�����������͡����Ϻ������������磬1998�ꡣ
[2] Cheng, Jincheng. Archetypal Criticism and Reinterpretation. Shanghai: Dongfang Press, 1988.]
[3] ——��������ԭ����ѧ�����о���������������������������磬2007�ꡣ
[4] [---. Studies on the Questions of Western Archetypal Aesthetics. Haerbin: Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House, 2007.]
[5] ������•��•�����ޣ����ڶ��ԡ����������롣�������й��鼮�����磬1998�ꡣ
[6] De Beauvoir, Simone. The Second Sex. Trans. Tao Tiezhu. Beijing: China Books Publishing House, 1998.]
[7] ����ƽ��“������Ů�����ʵĽ���——��ʮ���������й�Ů�����ʱ�Ǩ����”����������̳�� 2��2007����146-150��
[8] Dong, Jinping. “Discourse and the Construction of Female Temperament: An Analysis of the Changes in Chinese Female Temperament since the 20th Century.” Journal of Jianghuai Tribune 2 (2007): 146-150 ]
[9] ������“��ԭ������”�������������о��� 4��1988����67-73��
[10] [Duan, Lian. “On Archetypal Criticism.” Journal of Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art 4��1988����67-73 ]
[11] ����ǿ��“�ҹ��ŵ�С˵��ԭ������”�������������� 4����1990����29��
[12] [Fang, Keqiang. “Archetypal Images in Chinese Classic Novels.” Journal of Literary Debate
[13] (1990): 29]
[14] �����򣺡���������——�й���ѧ��ԭ����������������������ѧ�����磬2007�ꡣ
[15] Fu, Daobin. Bells of the Late Tang Dynasty: An Archetypal Criticism to Chinese Literature. Beijing: Beijing University Press, 2007.]
[16] �ٸ�“��������ѧ��ʫ�Ĺ�ϵ”������——ԭ����������Ҷ����ѡ�ࡣ����������ʦ����ѧ�����磬1987�ꡣ
[17] Jung, Carl. “A Study on the Relationship between Psychology and Poetry.” Mythological and Archetypal Criticism. Ed. Ye Shuxian. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University Press, 1987. ]
[18] ��ӱ��“Ů������Ȼ�ı�Դͬ������̬Ů�������˼��‘ԭ��’”��������ʦ����ѧѧ��������������ѧ�棩1��2010����35-39��
[19] Liu,Ying. “The Source Isomorphism between Women and Nature: The Ideological Prototype of Ecological Feminism .” Journal of Anhui Normal University ( Humanities and Social Sciences) 1 (2010): 35-39]
[20] ³��Ԫ�������壺������������������̬���������������о���5��1996����6��
[21] Lu, Shuyuan, and Xia Zhongyi. “From the Artistic Psychology to Spiritual Ecology.” Journal of Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art 5 (1996): 6]
[22] ����•��ˣ�“��Ů——�񻰵Ĵ�����”���������룬������Ů��������ѧ���ۡ���������ࡣ���֣�����ʦ����ѧ�����磬2007�ꡣ
[23] Lokke, Kari. “Women as Mythmakers.” Trans. Dong Junfeng. Feminist Literary Theory in the Western World. Ed. Bo Di. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press, 2007.]
[24] ����•Ī����“��¥��ķ�Ů��”�����ء����衢�ֽ����룬���Ϻ����ۡ�2��1989����
[25] Moi, Toril. “The Madwoman in the Attic.” Trans. Zhao Tuo, et al. Shanghai Literary Theory 2 (1989).]
[26] ——��“Ů��������ѧ����”���±���ժ�룬������������������6��1990����112-16��
[27] [---. “Feminist Literary Criticism.” Trans. Chen Benyi. Theory and Criticism of Literature and Arts 6 (1990):112-116.]
[28] ���нܣ�������ѧ���ۡ����Ϻ���������ѧ�����磬2002�ꡣ
[29] Wu, Zhongjie. Introduction to Studies of Literature and Art. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2002.]
[30] Ҷ����ѡ�ࣺ����——ԭ��������������������ʦ����ѧ�����磬1987�ꡣ
[31] Ye, Shuxian, ed. Mythological and Archetypal Criticism. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University Press, 1987.]
[32] ——����̽�������Ե����硷���ɶ����Ĵ���������磬1988�ꡣ
[33] [---. Explorations into the Non-Rational World. Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House, 1988.]
[34] ——������ѧ������ѧ��������������ѧ���׳����磬2003�ꡣ
[35] [---. Literature and Anthropology. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2003.]
[36] ֣Ԫ�ߣ���ͼ����ѧ���ִ����ࡷ���Ϻ���ѧ�ֳ����磬1992�ꡣ
[37] Zheng,Yuanzhe. Aesthetics of Totem and Modern Man. Shanghai: Xuelin Press, 1992.]
[38] ��������“ԭ����”���������о��� 5��1987����113��
[39] Zhou,Yongming. “On Archetype.” Journal of Literature & Art Studies 5 (1987): 113]
û���ҵ������������
 

版权所有 © 2011《思想政治课研究》编辑部 
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn